If someone uses that phrase, it usually means the opposite. In most cases, people saying ‘validation’ means they spoke to some potential customers who said it was a good idea. In others, it means they built a landing page and got some email sign ups. Or they gave a potential customer a list of 10 features that they’d never use and said, choose your favourite three.
These things are not validation.
Rarely does ‘validation’ mean a potential customer made a real commitment.
Rarely does ‘validation’ mean money exchanged hands.
Rarely does ‘validation’ mean some form of marketing was established, or a product was used.
If you’re truly validating something, then say what it was. (Hint: it’s not your whole business model.) And rather than say ‘validated’, say what you mean. It’s so much more helpful to you and the people listening.
“We spoke to 20 freelance graphic designers, and learned that 8 of them actively try new workflow ideas every month or so.”
“We set up Facebook events in a bunch of different cities, and Lyon, Munich and Vienna got more than 500 RSVPs each.”
“We shared beta access with a hundred brand managers, and a month later 60% were still using it every week.”
“We got an order.”
“A distributor agreed to add our product to their newsletter next month.”
“A procurement manager we spoke to was so excited, they’ve started the process of getting us on their supplier list.”
The people who get real validation, they never say ‘validation,’ they say what they learned and how they learned it. They talk about real commitment from customers, and they think in terms of evidence.
They’re really asking, “is this a good idea?”
The whole point of the validation concept in Lean Startup methodology is to learn now what will be costly to learn later. It’s to learn if your idea won’t work now, before you go too far down that road.
Most people treat it like a check-box though - to “get validation.” They look for anything that could confirm their belief that they’re on the right track and plod on naively.
Try thinking like a scientist, in terms of invalidation. What should I try so a possible result will cause me to stop or change course?
Please do yourself a favour. Stop thinking about “validation.” That’s good way to give yourself regrets. Instead, think in terms of evidence and invalidation.
It’s like building yourself a time machine, only less work.
If this sounds familiar, I’d love to hear from you on the new Source Community. Read more and discuss here.